Freedoms Essay
In December of 1975, John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt, three Iowa students from Des Moines, planned a silent protest of the Vietnam war by wearing black armbands to school. The principle later found out and created a policy that stated that students wearing an armband would be asked to remove it immediately. The three students violated the policy and got suspended from school. The right for a person to silent protest at a school should be allowed based on the first amendment because a school should be like a marketplace of ideas, it would end up giving the school too much power, and it was a peaceful protest.
Firstly, it should be allowed because a school should be like a marketplace of ideas. A judge dealing with this case said that it was fine for the kids to protest at school because school should be like a “marketplace of ideas.” At school you should be able to share your ideas and thoughts. Also, the kids went to school showing everyone their opinion and they should not be stopped because they have the right based off the first amendment. The first amendment is the freedom of speech, the kids are allowed to speak freely on what they think and should not be stopped while doing so.
Secondly, it should be allowed because later on the school would have too much power. Since the school suspended the kids for a silent protest that means that the school would have the power to do more. Everytime they have a situation like that they can create a policy for each situation and end up having a lot of power of the students going to the school at the time. Also, when a situation like that happens again and the school win when their in court that will give the school more power over the children.
Lastly, it should be allowed because the protest the kids did was silent. The kids should not get in trouble and get suspended because they performed a silent protest. They could have done it way worse but instead they decided to wear black armbands. The kids could have done a very violent protest with weapons but they did not. Also, since their protest was silent it did not cause any distraction to the students in the school or anyone in the school. They just wore something small.
In Conclusion, the right for a person to silent protest at a school should be allowed based on the first amendment because a school should like a marketplace of ideas, it would end up giving the school too much power, and it was a peaceful protest.
In December of 1975, John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt, three Iowa students from Des Moines, planned a silent protest of the Vietnam war by wearing black armbands to school. The principle later found out and created a policy that stated that students wearing an armband would be asked to remove it immediately. The three students violated the policy and got suspended from school. The right for a person to silent protest at a school should be allowed based on the first amendment because a school should be like a marketplace of ideas, it would end up giving the school too much power, and it was a peaceful protest.
Firstly, it should be allowed because a school should be like a marketplace of ideas. A judge dealing with this case said that it was fine for the kids to protest at school because school should be like a “marketplace of ideas.” At school you should be able to share your ideas and thoughts. Also, the kids went to school showing everyone their opinion and they should not be stopped because they have the right based off the first amendment. The first amendment is the freedom of speech, the kids are allowed to speak freely on what they think and should not be stopped while doing so.
Secondly, it should be allowed because later on the school would have too much power. Since the school suspended the kids for a silent protest that means that the school would have the power to do more. Everytime they have a situation like that they can create a policy for each situation and end up having a lot of power of the students going to the school at the time. Also, when a situation like that happens again and the school win when their in court that will give the school more power over the children.
Lastly, it should be allowed because the protest the kids did was silent. The kids should not get in trouble and get suspended because they performed a silent protest. They could have done it way worse but instead they decided to wear black armbands. The kids could have done a very violent protest with weapons but they did not. Also, since their protest was silent it did not cause any distraction to the students in the school or anyone in the school. They just wore something small.
In Conclusion, the right for a person to silent protest at a school should be allowed based on the first amendment because a school should like a marketplace of ideas, it would end up giving the school too much power, and it was a peaceful protest.